Detroit Court Reporters

Detroit Court Reporters

Detroit court reporters can help law firms achieve more.

Detroit court reporters have a reputation for professionalism and competence with the latest technology that has allowed them to position themselves as an important ally to the area legal community.

Video technology has become a specialty of Michigan court reporters, and video conferencing and video depositions have become important tools for today’s attorneys. This technology is allowing attorneys from around the country to work in Michigan remotely, saving time and money.  This also has allowed attorneys to take advantage of new multimedia ways to collect information and utilize it at trial.

For attorneys who need to visit our area and work, our conference rooms can make the trip a pleasure. We can provide fully equipped and comfortable locations for depositions and other legal meetings, while also providing a wide range of litigation support to help lawyers serve their clients with distinction.

With each new technology and innovation, lawyers are finding new ways to accomplish more on their cases. A court reporting firm that can provide new technology and the court reporting expertise to help lawyers with each facet of their cases can be a valuable resource. Choosing the right firm can be the difference that helps the law firm achieve their goals for their clients.

Working with us for your remote needs or when you are working right here in our area helps provide you with the confidence that you are getting the highest level of professional service. We bring innovative ideas, new technology, and our experience to each client we work with to help them better serve the interests of their clients.

Wheeling Court Reporters

Wheeling Court Reporters

Wheeling court reporters stay ahead of emerging technologies.

West Virginia legal professionals know that they can rely on Wheeling court reporters to provide the technology and the professionalism that allows them to work more efficiently in case preparation and more effectively at trial.

Now, through the National Network of Reporting Companies (NNRC), attorneys who have work in West Virginia can take advantage of these firms.

As technology has evolved, West Virginia court reporters have stayed ahead of emerging trends, meaning that law firms can be assured that they are getting access to the latest tools to help them work. Remote depositions, live legal video, and video depositions are all much easier when utilizing these firms who can handle the technological side of any legal challenge.

These professionals can also provide realtime reporting and other tools that help to add immediacy to the work of the law firm. Meaning that lawyers now have quick access to the information they need to best serve their clients.

With each new year, new technology changes the way lawyers need to approach their cases. New technology is having an impact across the legal profession, and it is sometimes challenging just to stay ahead of what is available. Court reporting companies in West Virginia take on the task of staying ahead of these innovations so that when your law firm is ready, they are ready to provide the latest in new ways of practicing.

When attorneys need to work in West Virginia, they can take advantage of conference rooms that provide an ideal place to conduct business with all of the equipment and comforts that can make working here a pleasure.

Minneapolis Court Reporters

Minneapolis Court Reporters

Minneapolis court reporters are providing new ways of handling cases.

Minneapolis court reporters bring new technology into law firms each day. This new technology is giving the legal community new ways to manage the increased information that comes into cases thanks to the information age. The same connectivity that gives us an incredible flow of information into cases can also be used to the attorney’s advantage when preparing the case, and Minnesota court reporters are leading the way in providing this technology.

Video is now an important part of the law firm. From video conferencing and video depositions to video presentations used in the courtroom, lawyers are finding new ways to bring this technology into their cases. It can help to eliminate travel, provide a better way to consume depositions, and even sway jurors in the courtroom. In each instance, experienced legal videographers provided by court reporting companies are bringing this technology to the law firm.

There are also several more tools that court reporting companies are bringing into the legal field. Realtime reporting, online repositories and other tools are giving attorneys new ways to control and store information, meaning they are equipped to face any challenge anywhere— even when it is far from the practice.

Choosing the right firm can mean the difference between having all of the technology needed to most efficiently and effectively handle a case or being left behind by the competition. Today’s court reporting firms can bring the best technology and the most experience to each challenge faced by the law firm while also providing the accurate and timely reporting services that attorneys need every day.

White Plains Court Reporters

White Plains Court Reporters

White Plains court reporters are evolving in today’s modern legal field.

White Plains court reporters are providing the vital link vital link between law firms and new technology that is propelling the legal field into the 21st century with new ways to conduct business. Through new options for connectivity and information management, law firms are working more efficiently than ever before.

Video technology is providing a way to link attorneys with their peers and other people important to their cases anywhere in the country. This technology is also offering attorneys a way to conduct a deposition over an internet connection taking advantage of broadcast-quality audio and video. Video hookups are also being augmented by realtime reporting which is giving the attorney immediate access to a transcript as the words are being spoken. This also accelerates the production of finished transcripts.

New York court reporters also can assist when lawyers still have the need to travel despite new technologies for connectivity. Working in a new city can be cumbersome without the right tools, and fully equipped conference rooms offer the toolbox that lets lawyers work more effectively. Connectivity and creature comforts are combined along with the services provided by some of the country’s best court reporting professionals to make working on the road a pleasure and a success.

Choosing the right court reporting firm can be the connection that law firms need to make in order to bring the pieces together for a new way of preparing for cases. Using new technology and taking advantage of the expertise of these experienced professionals, law firms are making the leap into a new way of practicing law.

Denver Court Reporters

Denver Court Reporters

Denver court reporters are bringing new technology to litigation support.

Denver court reporters are changing the types of services they provide to meet the needs of attorneys who are facing new challenges in the 21st century. Years ago, these teams of professionals primarily served to document legal proceedings, but now they are providing a number of other services that allow them to partner with the law firm.

One of the most important things that attorneys have is time, and there seems to be far too little of it to work on cases. Colorado court reporters can help law firms use their time more efficiently by introducing the firm to new tools that can save time and money.

Video conferencing has been an important time saving tool for attorneys, and it can save the time associated with traveling to and from depositions and other important events. Now, an attorney can simply utilize the skill and know-how of the court reporting company to set up conferencing links that allow lawyers to work remotely. Many law firms are also taking advantage of realtime reporting that helps the lawyer get access to rough transcripts as they happen. Testimony is delivered straight from the reporter’s stenography machine to the attorney’s laptop, meaning information flows more quickly than ever before.

This type of new technology that adds immediacy to the work of the law firm can be complex to set up, but it can eliminate many of the logistical challenges facing today’s attorneys. Those who are working on cases that may cross several districts or even states can often be handled with an ease that rivals a case that takes place in the firm’s own backyard. This is allowing law firms to expand their reach and serve more clients with the excellence that law firms provide.

Pittsburgh Court Reporters

Pittsburgh Court ReportersPittsburgh court reporters are helping to change the way legal professionals approach their cases through new technology. This is allowing the attorney to look at cases through a different lens where issues that once were time-consuming challenges can quickly be surmounted with new technology.

The internet has changed almost every industry in our world. In the legal profession where information is power, it has had a profound impact. More information is flowing from diverse sources, and without the right tools it can be difficult to manage.  Pennsylvania court reporters can provide online repositories for the storage of all types of media, where it can be quickly accessed when needed.

Volumes of information can be cumbersome, and indexing has become a valuable tool as well. This can help the lawyer quickly find the information that is crucial to cases.

Video technology is also a crucial part of today’s legal work. It allows the attorney to work remotely over secure videoconferencing connections, which means that remote depositions are a popular new way to save the time and expense once spent on travel.

Additionally, video can have a powerful impact in the courtroom. Many legal professionals are now turning to court reporting firms to help craft courtroom presentations that can have a lasting impact on jurors. These immersive multimedia presentations are a new way to deliver the argument to today’s media savvy juries.

New technology is one of the key products offered by today’s court reporters. It is changing the way lawyers work on their cases from the investigation and case preparation phases right through presentation in the courtroom.

Tucson Court Reporters

Tucson Court Reporters

The right court reporter in Tucson can make a difference in your case.

With so much technology available to today’s law firms, Tucson court reporters are providing an important function by being the liaison between today’s legal professional and the latest innovations.

With video technology playing a crucial role in the legal field, Arizona lawyers know that professional Arizona court reporters can provide the types of services that make a difference in case preparation and in the courtroom.

From investigation through trial, technology can work for attorneys through video conferencing that can eliminate travel and allow the law firm to work more efficiently. Video deposition services give legal professionals the added dimension of being able to evaluate the truthfulness of a deponent by seeing video and hearing audio.

Realtime reporting is also adding another dimension. Tucson court reporting companies can add immediacy to rough transcripts through this technology. It enables the attorney to have almost instantaneous access through streaming that can be accessed across a courtroom or across a continent.

For attorneys visiting Tucson to work on their cases, they can schedule depositions through the National Network of Reporting Companies. Video services, court reporting, and comfortable conference rooms with all of the vital equipment necessary to make the trip a success is at your disposal.

Choosing the right court reporting firm can make a difference in your case, and court reporting firms in Tucson, AZ are ready to help your firm achieve more remotely or right here in Arizona.

Austin Court Reporters


Austin Court Reporters

Austin court reporters are giving lawyers a new edge.

Austin court reporters are helping attorneys every day across the area by giving them tools to meet the challenges of the 21st century legal professional.

One of the most valuable things that a lawyer has is time. There seems to be a shortage of it when working on cases, and there are new tools to help lawyers maximize the use of their time that is available from today’s Texas court reporters.

Travel can often be all-consuming for the attorney. The travel itself can be time taken away from cases, and while working away from the practice lawyers can often find that they do not have all of the information they need to work. Court reporters are changing this.

Video conferencing provided by court reporting companies is giving lawyers a way to work remotely, meaning they do not have to spend nearly as much time away from their practices. This technology can be enhanced by realtime reporting which gives the attorney instantaneous access to a rough transcript of proceedings that are being held miles away.

Despite these innovations, it is still sometimes necessary for the lawyer to travel. When they do, online repositories can be a valuable tool for attorneys. This allows them to access all of the information for their cases in a password-protected online environment where they can also work collaboratively with their legal team. All types of media can be stored and accessed, meaning the attorney has everything they need at all times.

Bringing information together helps to make the work of the attorney go more smoothly, enabling them to be more effective for their clients. Today’s court reporter is helping attorneys do more with speed and efficiency utilizing innovative technology.

How We Crowd-Sourced Transcripts of the Entire Manning Court Martial

This fascinating story originally appeared on It can be found here.

On May 9, 2013, we made a bold claim on this website. We promised to crowd-fund enough money to hire independent court reporters to provide transcripts of the entire Manning court martial.

We knew that it was vital that the public have a virtual seat in Chelsea Manning’s trial.  A public record of the court proceedings could fuel better, more accurate, and more frequent news coverage of the trial and could hold the government to account for its actions during the court martial. The government had forbidden tape recorders or cameras from entering the courtroom, so the only way to get an accurate accounting of the proceedings was sending in someone to take notes by hand.

Paying professional court reporters to transcribe the proceedings seemed like the perfect solution – if it was possible.

We knew it would be hard, but had no idea how hard. At every turn, we faced new obstacles to getting transcripts of the trial. So, finally, here’s the story of what we faced – and all the people who helped us surmount those obstacles.

Where do you even find a court reporter?

The very first problem we faced was finding a court reporter that would work with us. We knew we needed a reputable court reporter/stenographer that could do real-time transcripts and would be familiar with military jargon. But many court reporters rely on military court systems for their livelihood and didn’t want to jeopardize those relationships. In addition, we were asking for an incredibly quick turnaround time in conditions that didn’t allow the court reporters a recorded backup, or the ability to ask for any court participants to slow down or repeat their statements, like most court reporters can. Given the long court hours, this puts a toll on any court reporter, no matter how good.

Tony Rolland

Tony Rolland, who connected us with Gore Brothers

We were incredibly thankful when court reporter Tony Rolland (pictured right) approached us and recommended Gore Brothers. They are a professional court reporting firm that serves the larger DC/Baltimore metropolitan area. While other court reporters turned down our business, Gore Brothers understood how important it was to have accurate, timely records available to the public for one of the most important trials in our lifetime. Even though it was a politically contentious issue, Gore Brothers took us on and agreed to send in court reporters.

Working with Gore, we realized that one court reporter wasn’t going to be nearly enough. Instead, Gore brought together a team of 6 court reporters so that there would be continual coverage throughout the many weeks of the trial.

We know that journalists need transcripts quickly in order to write stories about the trial, and so we prioritized speed in getting these transcripts made. That meant two court reporters every day: one covering the morning and one covering the afternoon. By having court reporters only covering half days, we could ensure that we got transcripts edited and live on the website faster – morning sessions would go live at 7 PM in the evening, afternoon sessions would be published early the following morning.

Wait, it costs how much?

The second barrier was funding. We knew that professional court reporters were expensive, but we underestimated how expensive. We originally believed we needed to raise $40,000-$50,000 to cover the entire trial.  But it quickly became apparent that we needed to raise twice that much.

What made this possible? Amazingly, it was individual donors. Over one thousand six hundred people chipped in $10, $20, and $50 because they believed that the Manning trial should be public for the whole world. The average donation was under $100.

We made the platform, but ultimately it was the generosity and faith of individuals making small contributions that made the transcripts possible.

Taking on the U.S. government

Money and a team of top-notch court reporters weren’t the only thing we needed to cover the Manning court martial. We also had to get into the courtroom, and the government made it very difficult for us and many other media organizations to access the trial.

We knew there were strict regulations preventing any electronic equipment in the courtroom, but the media center allowed journalists to bring in laptops as long as they didn’t record or connect to the Internet during the proceedings.

We knew we were far more likely to be allowed to bring stenography equipment into the media center than into the courtroom, so we teamed up with the Verge, the Guardian, and Forbes. Each organization requested a press pass for their reporter and a second press pass for a court reporter to accompany their reporter.

Unfortuantely, each was issued only one press pass, meaning there wasn’t an extra space for our court reporter.

And we weren’t the only ones shut out. Of the 350 media applications the government received, only 70 were granted.

We weren’t ready to give up. With the help of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, we organized a coalition of twenty major media organizations – including the Los Angeles Times, NPR, Fox News, and the New Yorker – and sent a letter to the Army requesting two additional press passes.

We also tried to find someone to lend us a press pass.  We reached out to individual media organizations and also tweeted in hopes that someone would lend us one, with no luck.

I flew out to Fort Meade the weekend before the court martial was scheduled to begin and began approaching journalists who had been granted press passes. Unsurprisingly, almost all of them refused to lend Freedom of the Press Foundation a pass.  Many wanted to help, but they didn’t want to give up their press passes for the first day of a historic trial.

Finally, the night before the trial began, we managed to get one press pass for the first day. Nathan Fuller, a blogger for the Private Manning Support Network, temporarily loaned us his pass. We are deeply indebted to Nathan for giving up his seat in the media center that day. It’s the only reason we managed to get a transcript of the first day.

After the first few days, the crowd in the media center thinned. We were able to use donated press passes from ARD German Radio, the Verge and Forbes.

During the trial

When court reporters work, they use a computerized stenotype machine to make a quick transcript. They sit close to the judge so that they can hear everything, and have the ability to interrupt proceedings or ask for clarifications in order to get an accurate transcription.  Above all, court reporters make a recording of everything, and double-check their transcripts against the audio recording.

Our court reporters were denied all of these things. They were in a room with the rest of the media, watching a live video feed of the court proceedings. The audio was muffled and difficult to understand at times, and there was no way to interrupt proceedings when things were hard to understand.

Worst of all, they were forbidden recording devices – so there was no way to double-check the accuracy of their notes. Instead, our court reporters simply had to transcribe as quickly as possible, often without breaks for long stretches of time, and try to get every word down accurately.

We also had trouble switching out court reporters midday. The strict rules meant that everyone who wanted in the media center had to be on base by 8 AM. This meant that both of our court reporters had to be on base at 8 AM, even though one didn’t start working until after lunch.  It was not until the defense brought this issue to the judge was our court reporter allowed to show up half way through the day.

Alexa O'Brien

Alexa O’Brien outside the media center at Ft. Meade. Photo by Xeni Jardin.

On more than one occasion, we ran into technical difficulties. Once we even lost a large section of the transcription.  Journalist Alexa O’Brien (pictured above) –whose own meticulous hand-typed transcripts of the trial have been an invaluable service to the public–generously offered to lend us her transcript from that day, for which we are deeply grateful. Her attention to detail is one of the many reasons we awarded Alexa a grant before the trial began.

After the trial

In all, we raised over $100,000 – all from individual contributions.

After fees taken out by credit card processors and our fiscal sponsor, that was about $5,000 more than the total needed to pay for the court reporters.

When we originally announced this campaign, we promised to donate any extra funds to the Manning Support Network. The Support Network has decided to apply half of that money to Chelsea Manning’s legal fees during her appeal and has generously offered to donate the other half back to the Freedom of the Press Foundation so we can continue our work.

You’ve probably noticed that there were a lot of people who went out on a limb to help us – folks like Tony Rolland, Gore Brothers, Nathan Fuller, Alexa O’Brien, Forbes, the Verge, the Guardian, ARD German Radio, the twenty media organizations that signed onto a coalition letter in support of our endeavor, and the hundreds upon hundreds of people who donated to ensure we could cover the costs of the court reporters. It is their generosity and their courage that was responsible for the Manning transcripts being freely available to the public today.

Member Profile: Boston Court Reporters

Member Profile: Boston Court ReportersA Q&A with O’Brien & Levine Court Reporting president Kenny Zais:

How and why did you come to work with law firms? 

Given that court reporting is an essential resource for litigation attorneys, our business is synonymous with working with law firms. Court reporters are impartial officers of the court. They have the crucial role of providing the official record of sworn testimony when witnesses are deposed during the discovery process in preparation for trial.

In addition to depositions, attorneys also bring in court reporters to produce transcripts for arbitrations, hearings, trials and audio recordings.

O’Brien & Levine has always been in the forefront of deploying technology that supports the legal team throughout the discovery process.

Why is your service/product important to law firms? 

Litigation practices are international in scope, with depositions in high stakes cases going forward locally as well as across the country and around the world. Consolidating scheduling wherever the matter proceeds, with whatever is required, ensures reliability and consistency.

As discovery continues, timely, accurate delivery of testimony becomes a cornerstone for the litigation team. They rely on word-for-word transcripts to build the argument on the client’s behalf, prove a position, and ultimately, make the case.

This being the 21st Century, what we think of as a “transcript” has been re-imagined. While the traditional printed and bound version has its place, today, versatile electronic file formats for transcripts and exhibits are wholly compatible with firms’ internal information management systems. Video adds another dimension to depositions, allowing the legal team to observe the behavior of witnesses.

The big picture advantage is that attorneys can easily collaborate across geographies and time zones to fine-tune strategy and keep the client apprised.

What makes your service/product unique? 

We recognize that clients expect their law firms to be mindful of cost pressures and seek savings when resources are brought in during the course of litigation. While the shorthand principles of court reporting that bring speed and accuracy to capturing testimony are unchanged, advances in technology have changed everything else.

For example, watching a live stream of a news broadcast on a computer or tablet is now routine. Similarly, Internet connectivity can be deployed in the legal arena. Here, both the court reporter and videographer stream text and video of a deposition to remote participants’ computers.

Let’s say the legal assistant has scheduled a deposition in California for your firm’s lead litigation partner to depose a witness in a patent infringement case. While it would be great for the associate and the expert who has been retained to be present, it is imperative to manage expenses. Rather than boarding a flight and booking a hotel, they can attend via real-time streaming over the Internet.

No special software is required. Plus, they can take advantage of the secure, private chat feature to confer as if they were there, relaying insights for the attorney’s line of questioning. The Boston-based associate points out inconsistent testimony and the expert in New York questions the validity of a claim.

Share how your company solves problems. 

The discussion of what makes us unique definitely relates to how we solve problems. Expanding on the example of conducting depositions v! ia Internet streaming, the litigation group can count on O’Brien & Levine to come through in a range of situations and scenarios, whether scheduling with us for the first time or if we’ve been working together for more than 20 years.

Videoconferencing is another option for conducting depositions remotely, again, reducing travel costs and time out of the office. We can host your firm’s team in our videoconferencing center and coordinate with the other parties wherever they are located.

I noted that the legal assistant scheduled the deposition in California. When a big case is underway, it is important for litigation group members to know they are in good hands, meaning they don’t have to be hands-on themselves to coordinate the logistical and technical details.

This is a huge help to the legal assistant or paralegal on the front lines. A partner says, “Here are the notices for a week of depositions in California and Texas, starting the day after tomorrow.

Please line up a reporter and videographer.” Rather than taking a chance on a Google search, O’Brien & Levine takes care of all the arrangements seamlessly, just as if they were scheduling locally. For an extra measure of assurance, every member of the team can view the deposition calendar through our web portal to confirm time, location and get directions.

When final transcripts are ready, they are immediately available for download as pdf documents through our secure, online repository, with exhibits scanned and linked. The benefit here is that correlating paper exhibits to testimony when reviewing transcripts can be burdensome, if not impractical, especially when legal team members are traveling. Now, when the attorney sees the reference to “exhibit 36” in the transcript, a click on the link for “exhibit 36” opens it up. There is never an issue of a misplaced exhibit.

I mentioned video depositions as a way to observe behavior, but there’s more to it. Evidence is all the more compelling when the video is synchronized with the text of the testimony. Each line scrolls as the witness speaks—capturing demeanor, body language and tone of voice. The real value, though, is searchability. Instead of the labor-intensive task of constantly rewinding and fast-forwarding to pinpoint a piece of testimony, the legal team can highlight the text, zero-in on crucial statements, then easily create video clips to import into trial presentation software.

Finally, we understand that litigation is not a 9-5 proposition. Clients expect responsiveness, as does the litigation team. O’Brien & Levine is reachable 24/7.

Share a success story your company has experienced working with a law firm.

Due to the confidential nature of our work with law firms, I’m not able to name names and specify a success story. However, in the aggregate, success stories are evident with a look at our calendar on any given day. The schedule shows assignments we are covering in Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, London, Cape Town. Every job has it particulars. One may require an Arabic interpreter. Another includes the participation of an intellectual property expert who is attending via Internet streaming. Yet another calls for a legal videographer and a one-day turnaround.

Cases range across all practices: intellectual property, employment law, insurance/reinsurance, construction, maritime, professional liability, domestic relations, contract disputes, product liability, zoning, environmental and so forth, attesting to the broad experience of our court reporters and videographers who greet your team.

Share your “WOW” factor.

The question brings to mind a remark from one of our longtime clients. O’Brien & Levine, he noted, has “gracefully fulfilled every outrageous request I have ever made.” I’ve referred to technology throughout and I like to think that our ongoing investment gives us the ability to fulfill every request, outrageous or otherwise.

We’ve just introduced a service for electronic handling of exhibits via the iPad, before, during, and after the deposition. A secure, cloud-based server allows counsel to mark and simultaneously introduce exhibits to the witness, co-counsel, opposing counsel and other participants, whether they are in the deposition room or attending remotely.