Chicago Court Reporting Firms

Chicago court reporting firms

Chicago court reporters are providing realtime reporting to give lawyers a new tool.

For the busy attorney, the logistics of arranging meetings can cost time for clients. Each moment that can be saved from working on setting up these meetings can be spent working on case preparation or meeting the demands of crowded court dockets around the country.

Chicago court reporters ensure that lawyers meet the demands of their bust schedules by offering a variety of services for bust legal professionals.

Using technology, court reporters can help bring attorneys from around the country together with clients, witnesses, and other lawyers through live legal video. Using this technology, lawyers can stay close to their practices and their clients and work on cases remotely, engaging in negotiations, arbitration, and other meetings via the web. This can be coupled with realtime reporting that allows the attorney to connect directly with the reporter’s equipment to see testimony as it is uttered.

For attorneys around the country the creation of an accurate record of the meetings is paramount to the success of cases. Transcripts from these meetings can come via accurate and professional court reporting companies that offer attorneys word-searchable databases to find important pieces of testimony.

In each case, technology and professional services of these firms can help attorneys stay focused on their primary task of working for their clients. The time saved by these services and the invaluable tools provided by the connectivity of legal video and professional reporting services can help lawyers work through their busy caseloads with confidence.

Miami Court Reporters Give Attorneys New Tools

 

Miami Court Reporters Give Attorneys New Tools

Working on cases in Miami has never been easier thanks to Miami court reporters.

Miami court reporters can help law firms modernize by giving them access to new technological tools that can help them operate more efficiently. Today’s law firms are finding that their cases can often take them across the country because of our interconnected world, and this can create a need for the law firm to extend its reach.

The internet is giving law firms new ways to work across the country using video conferencing. Video depositions can now be viewed anywhere in the world as they happen with live streaming, and realtime reporting gives lawyers every piece of information they need to work on their cases from anywhere.

Miami court reporting companies also can still provide the highest quality court reporting and transcription services that can help law firms to have accurate information to better serve their clients.

For attorneys visiting South Florida, court reporting firms can also provide facilities to help make working here a pleasure. Capability and comfort are the hallmarks of our conference rooms, and they can offer attorneys a place to make their travel as productive as possible. These conference rooms are also equipped with all of the technology to allow legal professionals to stay in touch with other members of their teams anywhere in the country through internet, phone, and teleconferencing capabilities.

Through the National Network of Reporting Companies (NNRC), legal professionals can schedule a deposition with the finest court reporters in South Florida and Miami Dade. Find out how we can help your law firms succeed.

The Justice System: A Force For Balance

The Justice System: A Force for Balance

The justice system is meant to provide fairness for all.

It is in the courts that citizens are on equal ground with powerful billon-dollar multinational corporations. And while it may be true that the more wealthy party in a lawsuit is able to hire the best lawyers, the most expensive experts, and the strongest litigation support team, still the principles of fairness and equity are the rule in the court.

The facts of the case are truly the essence of the matter in the justice system.  The judge is there to oversee the proceedings, to rule on disputes, and to present the law to the jury.  The lawyers are there to argue the case and present their view of the law and facts to the court.

Witnesses are present to give evidence and to explain that individual’s view of relevant facts, under a strict oath to remain utterly truthful.  The jury, of course, is there to weigh the evidence, to analyze the facts and the law and to reach a verdict as to what happened, who is responsible, and to assess the damages.  A litigation support team operates behind the scenes to make sure that details are taken care of, and court reporting companies are called upon as needed to provide solid professional and accurate record of the proceedings.

Often the judge may need to review critical pieces of evidence, when considering and ruling on a motion, for instance.  And often, the judge may need to review testimony, which has been preserved in a written record, called a transcript.  Court reporting companies sends court reporters to take down all the verbal evidence and argument in the case, word-for-word, and then type it up into a transcript booklet for the court to review in ruling on a motion or making a final decision.

Without a verbatim record of all the proceedings, in other words, without professional court reporting, the judge cannot go back over testimony and argument and recall what was said in exact detail.  The judicial system relies to a great degree on reliability of facts and evidence that are presented in court, and so it relies heavily on the accuracy and skill of court reporters in making a complete record of the all proceedings.

Court Reporting Companies in Florida

 

Court Reporting Companies in Florida

Florida court reporting companies can help bring technology to law firms.

Court reporting companies in Florida supply court reporters that have the ability to provide transcription services for a variety of needs. A reputable company will realize that no two cases are exactly alike and to provide the best experience for an assortment of litigation. Not only will they offer all services from transcription to stenography and from litigation support to video services, but they will make sure that their reporters have experience with and are well versed in each of them.

Depositions

Depositions are sworn statements and today they can be transferred to a live streaming service via a court reporter who knows how to work with real time reporting. This allows for attorneys to be at a deposition from another location as they will attend remotely through their laptops using video and audio feed. Plus, they will receive an electronic transcript shortly after the deposition is over.

Litigation Support

Preparing for a trial requires multiple documents that will need to be stored, transmitted, and reviewed. A court reporting company will be able to handle this efficiently. They will be able to queue documents, exhibits, and transcripts for trial.  Storing all of this information in their hard drives will allow you to access it from anywhere in the world.

Video Services

Transcripts are effective, but they do not show the emotions of someone giving a deposition. Video services will allow lawyers to see the person giving the testimony. Court reporting companies can store this video data and make it available to the person requiring it over the internet, on a DVD, or in a condensed digital format.

Court Reporters

Modern technology is impressive; however, a court reporting company will also offer transcription services, stenography, and real-time transcription. The reporter is still the one who makes the record. Certified Miami court reporters will make sure that the transcriptions are accurate. They will be competent and reliable and certified by the National Court Reporters Association.

From Louis Brandeis to Sonia Sotomayor, The Steno Machine is a Technological Marvel

From Louis Brandeis to Sonia Sotomayor, The Steno Machine is a Technological Marvel

The steno machine has stood the test of time through evolving technology.

By Kenneth A. Zais, President, O’Brien & Levine Court Reporting

The court reporter’s shorthand steno machine may look much the same as it did 100 years ago when the format debuted, and when Louis Brandeis, then a litigator in Boston, might have taken a deposition. But the resemblance stops there. Under the keys, there are ongoing technological advances that Sonia Sotomayor could have tapped into 20 years ago, as litigators can continue to do so today. And let’s not forget video.

This being the 21st Century, chances are you’ve streamed live news broadcasts to your TV, computer, tablet or smart phone. Similarly, Internet connectivity provided by Boston court reporters allows the legal team to attend a deposition remotely, across geographies and time zones. Through realtime streaming, they can follow the live text of a deponent’s testimony from the steno machine, along with live video streamed right from the videographer’s camera.

Let’s say you are pursuing a patent infringement lawsuit on behalf of a Massachusetts company against a competitor located in California. Discovery in this multi-jurisdictional case includes depositions around the country. A key witness, the software engineer at the defendant company, is based in San Francisco. Your primary expert is in New York City. Your law firm is in Boston.

Virtual Attendance

You head to California to depose the software engineer. While you want your team present, it is also important to manage costs. With realtime streaming, your expert, as well as your associate and paralegal who are familiar with the intricacies of the case can participate through their computers. No special software is required. Since travel time can easily exceed the duration of a deposition, there is no need for them to be away from the office for several days, collecting receipts to submit with expense reports.

Still, through the instant messaging feature available with realtime, you are able to confer as if they were there, garnering insights for your line of questioning. For example, your associate may flag inconsistent testimony or your expert may question the validity of a claim. As the witness testifies, text can be highlighted, annotated and coded by issue, and preserved for reference as the case proceeds.

For multi-day depositions, a rough draft of the transcript is available at the conclusion of the day’s questioning for review and preparation for the next day.

On Camera

Again, let’s not forget that the camera was rolling. The video of the deposition can be produced with synchronized text, the same way it appeared live over the Internet during the deposition. When playing the video file, each line of testimony scrolls as the witness speaks—capturing demeanor, body language and tone of voice.

The real value, though, is searchability. Instead of rewinding and fast-forwarding to pinpoint the testimony that corresponds to the transcript, run text-based searches to zero-in on crucial statements, then easily create video clips to import into trial presentation software.

Mark (and Link) Exhibits

These days, you are no doubt accustomed to receiving final transcripts electronically, in the format you prefer, such as searchable full and mini PDF documents, a standard ASCII text file or a .ptx file.

Then there are exhibits. A stack of exhibits in a tower of banker’s boxes. They are marked and stickered. Copied and bound. As you review the transcript, you search through the stack to put your hand on the one that corresponds to Exhibit 35.

Keep in mind that like transcripts, court reporters can provide exhibits electronically by simply scanning and creating PDF documents. Then they’ll take it one step further and hyperlink exhibits to the electronic transcript. Click on the link for Exhibit 35 and there it is.

However, even before instructing the court reporter to retain exhibits for transcript production, new software enables a complete electronic process for handling exhibits via the iPad – before, during, and after the deposition. A secure, cloud-based server allows counsel to mark and simultaneously introduce exhibits to the witness, co-counsel, opposing counsel and other participants, whether they are in the deposition room or attending remotely.

It’s the electronic equivalent of sliding a page across the table for the witness to review, and circulating copies around the room (or faxing/emailing to those attending remotely). Plus, the parties retain their personal, annotated copies of all exhibits on their iPads, while marinating the integrity of  the official versions.

The advantage? Eliminate the cumbersome, time-consuming process of printing, shipping and lugging boxes of exhibits.

Fast Forward

If you see a depiction of a deposition that went forward in 1913, the stenographer’s keypad will look remarkably familiar. But everything else has changed.

In 2013, the court reporter/videographer team greets you wherever you designate, be it Boston, San Francisco, New York, Chicago, London, Paris or Tel Aviv. They make the connections and go on the record, keeping legal team members around the world on track.  Following the proceeding, whether it’s a deposition, arbitration, trial or hearing, your transcripts and exhibits are always readily accessible on any computer or tablet.  And of course, your phone.

Kenneth A. Zais is president of O’Brien & Levine Court Reporting (www.court-reporting.com), based in Boston and offering worldwide coverage. He is a long-time member of and is active in leadership roles with the National Network of Reporting Companies (NNRC), an organization of innovative agencies providing worldwide services for court reporting, videography and more. In addition, he has served on the board of the Society for the Technological Advancement of Reporting (STAR) and maintains an active membership.

Other professional affiliations include the National Court Reporters Association (NCRA), the Massachusetts Court Reporters Association (MCRA) and the United States Court Reporters Association (USCR.)

Ohio Court Reporters

Ohio Court Reporters

Ohio court reporters can be part of the solution to a number of challenges facing today’s legal professionals.

Ohio court reporters are helping the legal community in the Buckeye State and across the country with innovative technological solutions to case preparation and presentation.

As law firms work to handle more clients in a variety of areas of the law, large volumes of information are needed from a variety of sources. This can sometimes pose logistical challenges as since law firms are sometimes forced to travel far from their own communities to areas around the country to conduct depositions and do other case-related work.

Ohio court reporting companies can help provide important support to lawyers visiting Ohio by providing a number of high-quality solutions to help people work more efficiently. This includes video deposition and realtime reporting that can provide a textured look at depositions, allowing the attorney, support staff, and ultimately jurors an informative way to assess truthfulness.

When visiting, lawyers can also take advantage of equipped conference rooms that provide a comfortable setting where lawyers can work more efficiently and make their travel more worthwhile.

In some cases, technology can offer options for the attorney to avoid traveling. Through our association with the National Network of Reporting Companies (NNRC), lawyers can schedule depositions and even work remotely on their cases, allowing them to avoid the burdens of high costs and lost time that can come with travel.

Choosing an Ohio court reporting firm can offer today’s legal professional with a number of new options that change the way they work in a challenging legal field.

Columbus Court Reporters

Columbus Court Reporters

Columbus court reporters can help attorneys here and around the country through NNRC.

Columbus court reporters are providing the valuable resources and technology to help law firms succeed in the 21st century. This comes through an attention to detail and a constant understanding of emerging technologies that can give lawyers an edge.

One of the most important new tools today is video technology, and it can have a variety of applications for the legal professional. First, it can be used to save time and money once spent on travel through remote video conferencing and depositions. This allows the attorney to depose anyone from anywhere with a video connection.

Another way that video is enhancing lawyers’ work is through courtroom presentations. A picture says a thousand words, and it can also help juries evaluate truthfulness in a video deposition. Video technology can also be used to help legal teams present information in engaging ways that jurors absorb and take with them into the deliberation room.

These same court reporters also continue to provide high quality realtime court reporting and transcription services that help law firms quickly get the information they need to best serve their clients.

Columbus court reporting companies are providing new ways for lawyers to work each day while also assisting attorneys around the country through the National Network of Reporting Companies (NNRC). Through NNRC, attorneys anywhere in the country can schedule a deposition or other services to take advantage of these skilled and highly professional court reporters.

Independent Court Reporters Tapped for Orlando Conference

Ryan Reporting Tapped for Orlando ConferencePast President Duane O’Geil of Independent Reporters in Calgary, Alberta and Carol Goin, owner of Ryan Reporting in Rockledge, Florida are exhibiting at the International Paralegal Management Association (IPMA) Conference in Orlando, FL. this week!

Court Reporter vs. Tape Recorder

Court Reporter vs. Tape Recorder

A court reporter can offer significant advantages to tape recording hearings.

Thirty-three years. That’s how long I have been a California shorthand reporter. During that time, I have reported thousands of depositions, hearings, arbitrations, city council meetings, stockholder meetings, business meetings, and worked in the Los Angeles Superior Court reporting numerous felony trials . You name it, I’ve probably done it.

Ten years ago, I reluctantly agreed to transcribe taped proceedings, but quickly decided I disliked it, primarily because of the poor quality of the tape. When I was recently offered  a job assignment to transcribe a taped hearing for a state agency, I decided to give it a try. After all, in the past 10 years, the quality of tape recordings must have greatly improved.  The added incentive for me was that I didn’t have to drive anywhere, fight traffic, and could be in the comfort of my home. The job was to be a quick turnaround so it needed to be done in a hurry.

After 654 pages of dense taped testimony, it was reinforced why it’s absolutely imperative to have Orange County court reporters at the proceedings to ensure an accurate record. The operative word here is “accurate.”   Timewise, it took me almost twice as long to produce a quasi-accurate record. I had to keep replaying parts I couldn’t hear, could partially hear or understand, and try to identify and distinguish certain voices that sounded similar. Yet, despite this time and effort, the end result had deficiencies and gaps.

It is essential the official guardian of the record be on scene in the room. My biggest realization is that the presence of a trained court reporter who is responsible for the record is what unconsciously dictates the behavior of the participants.

With taped proceedings, the participants easily forget a record is being made. Frequently, the arbitrator, attorneys and witnesses talk on top of each other, making it impossible to detect what was being said and who was speaking. The problem is not cured even after slowing the recording down and listening to it over and over again. In this instance, not only did they forget a record was being made by the tape recorder, the colloquy between the attorneys and arbitrator was often more in a conversational mode rather than the formal dialogue usually engaged in when an official record is being produced. The conversations were prolonged, adding unnecessary pages to an already long hearing.

Second, occasionally one of the parties remembered it was being taped and put her voice right up to the tape recorder, rendering a garbled, unintelligible sound.  It was impossible to understand what she was saying.

Third, an attorney and the arbitrator had similar sounding voices so there were times where I could do no more than make a guess who was speaking.

Fourth, if an attorney or witness was looking at documents, when pages were turned close to the microphone, the sound that was the loudest was the page turning, cancelling out or muffling the person’s voice.

The quality of the tape proved to be ridiculously poor. Apparently it was a hot day and there was a fan in the room creating a lot of ambient noise. This drowned out voices when the person walked away from the microphone. And if the person was soft-spoken, it was unfathomable to discern what was being said despite turning the playback up to full volume.

The final straw that almost broke my back was, for some mysterious reason  throughout three days of listening to these tapes, loud static would randomly interfere with the transmission and obliterate what anybody said. There were full sentences unable to be transcribed because of this phenomenon. The result was numerous inaudible blurbs scattered throughout the transcripts, making a verbatim transcript impossible to produce.  I hope it wasn’t important testimony that was wiped out .

These sentiments were shared among the team of reporters assigned to this project.   This started as a project with “a few tapes” to transcribe. It consisted of various interviews and an arbitration hearing. It was initially assigned to one reporter. After listening to the first few recordings, the reporter recognized that this project was a lot larger than anticipated and could not be transcribed in the time given. A team of nine reporters was assembled to transcribe what turned out to be 3,209 pages of transcript. They spent a total of 316 hours, averaging ten pages an hour. There were some tapes of such poor quality that the reporters were only able to transcribe at a rate of five to six pages an hour. One day, the recording was completely blank.

If these proceedings had been reported by a live reporter, it could have been handled by two reporters. The time it takes to prepare a transcript varies from 20 to 50 pages an hour, depending on the density of material. The preparation time for the 3,209 pages would have been from 64 hours to 160 hours. Transcribing from a tape recording took two to five times longer than using a live reporter.

Of the 3,209 pages, there were 320 inaudible sections. Even with an arbitrator moderating the recorded hearing, there were 175 inaudible sections. These inaudible sections consisted of overlapping speakers, slurred/mumbled speech, witnesses quietly thinking out loud, and  poor recording due to speakers being too far away from the microphones.  Even with the reporters listening to portions over and over again, it was just impossible to decipher what was being said.

Having California court reporting companies present is the most efficient and accurate way to ensure the best possible recording of proceedings for the following reasons:

  • A live reporter can ask for spellings not only of participants’ names but of words unique to the case
  • A live reporter can police the proceedings when the arbitrator fails to by requesting people not talk over each other
  • A live reporter can slow a fast talker down in order to reflect precisely what’s being said
  • A live reporter can actually see who is talking and identify the speaker correctly
  • A live reporter can ask for clarification if a word is mispronounced, slurred, or mumbled
  • A live reporter uses state-of-the-art software that offers multiple backups so there would never be a “blank recording”

Most importantly, a live court reporter, not an inanimate object, can ensure the record is verbatim and accurately reflected which should be the goal for both the reporter and the client.

Evelyn Mah
Abrams, Mah & Kahn
4101 Birch St., Suite 130
Newport Beach, CA 92660
P: 800.622.0226, F: 949.261.6688
info@AMKreporting.com

Cleveland Court Reporting Services

Cleveland Court Reporting Services

Cleveland court reporters can be a powerful asset.

For attorneys working in Cleveland, there are fewer assets more critical than the work of Cleveland court reporting companies. They can provide the experience and technological savvy to help attorneys accomplish their goals and better serve their clients with greater speed, economy, and efficiency.

One of the ways that Cleveland court reporters are accomplishing this is by staying ahead of new technologies that can enhance the work of the law firm. Over the last several years, several new tools have become available that allows law firms to take advantage of broadcast quality video that almost gives them the power to be in two places at once.

Using video conferencing coupled with video depositions and high quality video and audio, an attorney can work on a deposition in Cleveland from anywhere via an electronic, live hookup. When attorneys feel the need to work in person here, support personnel can view a live deposition via the hookup and even communicate with counsel over a secure chat hookup.

Cleveland attorneys who can accomplish their depositions in person also have several reasons to choose experienced court reporters. Trial presentations have become more sophisticated, and for better or worse more trials on television means more exposure to the courtroom for potential jurors who have grown to have an expectation of new technology and multimedia presentations.

Choosing the right court reporting firm can be a crucial detail that makes a difference in how cases are approached during pretrial and how they are presented to juries. Choosing a firm that can craft innovative solutions for each challenge can be a key to success.